[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.comWed Mar 23 09:13:49 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Springtime CentOS 5.6 and 6.0 status updates
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all, Please, first of all, I don't want to start a flame about this subject. I only wnat to know CentOS's developers point of view about this particular. Due to the delays that occurs in the release of new CentOS's versions and patches, and because CentOS developers involved in these tasks may not have sufficient time to devote to it (and also make if freely and spending their time), and I think that has been much talk about the whys for users and developers: - Why not a distribution fusion between Scientific Linux and CentOS? - Why not join efforts in the development of a single Enterprise Linux solid distribution based on RHEL? I repeat: I only want to know your point of view. Thanks. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Springtime CentOS 5.6 and 6.0 status updates
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list