[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.comWed Mar 23 09:13:49 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Springtime CentOS 5.6 and 6.0 status updates
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi all,
Please, first of all, I don't want to start a flame about this
subject. I only wnat to know CentOS's developers point of view about
this particular.
Due to the delays that occurs in the release of new CentOS's versions
and patches, and because CentOS developers involved in these tasks may
not have sufficient time to devote to it (and also make if freely and
spending their time), and I think that has been much talk about the whys
for users and developers:
- Why not a distribution fusion between Scientific Linux and CentOS?
- Why not join efforts in the development of a single Enterprise Linux
solid distribution based on RHEL?
I repeat: I only want to know your point of view.
Thanks.
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Springtime CentOS 5.6 and 6.0 status updates
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list