[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.comWed Mar 23 09:46:21 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/23/2011 10:27 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > Scientific Linux uses upstream source to create their own repo, without > desire to be 100% compatible. > > CentOS project is dedicated to provide (as close as possible) 100% > compatibility. It's not just a rebuild of upstream sources, goal is tu > *duplicate* RHEL. > > It's that simple. And this was answer many times in this and other > mailing lists, forum threads.... > > Ljubomir > I know that SL includes some custom components like OpenAFS in their distribution, but base system is the same as CentOS. Then, I repeat, why not? -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list