[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.comWed Mar 23 10:00:09 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/23/2011 10:52 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:46:21AM +0100, carlopmart wrote: >> >> I know that SL includes some custom components like OpenAFS in their >> distribution, but base system is the same as CentOS. Then, I repeat, why >> not? > > Because unless something has changed SL does not profess to be > binary compatible with upstream Are you sure?? What does it means "binary compatible" for you?? To me it means that the software "foo" works perfectly on both distros. And all the software I've tried, commercial and GNU, it works in both distributions with the same mistakes and equally effective and performance. -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list