[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
office at plnet.rsWed Mar 23 10:17:49 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Compare those 2 sentances: > "The base SL distribution is basically Enterprise Linux, recompiled from > source. -snip- > "Q. What is Scientific Linux? > > A. Scientific Linux is in essence, a commercial enterprise linux > distribution, recompiled. and compare it with this statement: "CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendors redistribution policy and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork)." For me, "basically" and "in essence" is not as same as "aims to be 100% binary compatible" If you can not see and understand, then I, or anyone else, can not help you to understand the difference. Ljubomir
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list