[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
carlopmart
carlopmart at gmail.comWed Mar 23 10:45:16 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 03/23/2011 11:42 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 03/23/2011 12:20 PM, Rainer Traut wrote: >> Am 23.03.2011 11:09, schrieb Manuel Wolfshant: >>> if you examine certain packages you will notice that there are linking >>> differences between what SL ships and what RH ships. >> Can you give an example of such package/binary? > I can but I am not sure that I may. So I won't. Then, why you say that without evidence? -- CL Martinez carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list