[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Dag Wieers
dag at wieers.comThu Mar 24 15:42:30 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Lamar Owen wrote: > Or we could all still be on apt-rpm and still be having multilib and > related issues. And while synaptic is still far and away the best > package management GUI out there bar none, the apt-rpm backend has (or > at least had) significant issues at that time. Hey ! There was nothing wrong with apt-rpm, I've been using it until November last year on CentOS-5 before I switched to RHEL6. The multi-lib problems were exagerated and fixed, the biggest problem was the lack of development after the main developer moved to Conectiva, and the second maintainer to Red Hat. But I do prefer python over C++ anytime, though speedwise it was unbeatable. -- -- dag wieers, dag at wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, info at dagit.net, http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list