[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comThu Mar 24 17:02:44 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 3/24/2011 11:54 AM, Jeff Sheltren wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Les Mikesell<lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 3/24/2011 10:44 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>>>> I never quite understood why that wasn't designed in from the start. >>>> >>>> Because the yellowdog updater-modified developers didn't have that lofty of a goal in mind from the start? >>>> >> >> I think it was the opposite - that they had the lofty goal of having all >> repositories coordinated even though that is clearly impossible unless >> you can dictate a jailed iphone-like world. > > There weren't really "external" repositories when yum came out. I > won't speak for Seth, but in my opinion, the goal of yum was "help end > RPM dep hell". And thankfully it did (combined with lots of packaging > improvements in rh/fedora, etc.). Really? I thought freshrpms was around (and wonderful) back when you had to use some apt derivative to use it. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list