[CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
Устинов Александр Александрович
rusfearuth at gmail.comThu Mar 24 02:07:28 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
SL has extra packages (it means they wasn't included into RHEL) that was included in it. ... we have added several packages to Scientific Linux that are not found anywhere in the upstream release, including IceWM, OpenAFS, Revisor, Live USB Creator, YUM auto-update, external YUM repositories... (c) from http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06549 SL and CentOS like two people that go different ways, but have the common base. Kind regards, Alexander Ustinov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110324/1e76f5d9/attachment-0002.html>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Why not a fusion between CentOS and SL?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list