On 03/09/2011 10:00 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >> On 03/09/2011 05:47 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> Can you comment on CentOS 6.0 status? Is it still 2-3 weeks from now or >>> was there any progress that will shorten this period? >> >> 2 - 3 weeks from GA release of 5.6 is still a good time line to plan >> against. > > If the response to a question regarding "CentOS 6.0 status" only > relates to "GA release of 5.6", then, in spite of the constant > responses to the contrary, there is a discrepancy between "what is > expected from CentOS", and "what is delivered by CentOS". Period. End > of story. Own up to it. Fix it. Take you expectations and your condescending attitude someplace else. You get a free operating system that is enterprise grade when we provide it for you. If you don't like it, don't use it. If you want a service level agreement with guaranteed deliverables, buy one. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 253 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110310/416bf803/attachment-0005.sig>