-----Original message----- To: centos-devel at centos.org; From: Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> Sent: Thu 10-03-2011 21:29 Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] Updates from today Attachment: signature.asc > On 03/09/2011 10:00 PM, Jerry Amundson wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > >> On 03/09/2011 05:47 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >>> Can you comment on CentOS 6.0 status? Is it still 2-3 weeks from now or > >>> was there any progress that will shorten this period? > >> > >> 2 - 3 weeks from GA release of 5.6 is still a good time line to plan > >> against. > > > > If the response to a question regarding "CentOS 6.0 status" only > > relates to "GA release of 5.6", then, in spite of the constant > > responses to the contrary, there is a discrepancy between "what is > > expected from CentOS", and "what is delivered by CentOS". Period. End > > of story. Own up to it. Fix it. > > Take you expectations and your condescending attitude someplace else. > > You get a free operating system that is enterprise grade when we provide > it for you. > > If you don't like it, don't use it. > > If you want a service level agreement with guaranteed deliverables, buy one. > Enough of this slanging match! The professionalism of this list has gone right down the tubes! Please take the 'Ce' out and make it ntOS. It has nothing to do with Community or Enterprise. I have decided to take all my servers to Scientific Linux forthwith. I will not touch CentOS with a bargepole from now on. Goodbye Bill