[CentOS-devel] Updates from today

Thu Mar 10 22:26:53 UTC 2011
Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>

On 03/10/2011 04:18 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> 
>> On 03/10/2011 03:45 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know of Karanbir, Tru and you, but haven't seen anyone else announcing
>>>> signed packages. From the Team page at http://wiki.centos.org/Team I can
>>>> only identify Russ as being active on the mailinglist.
>>>
>>> Sorry Ralph ! You too ;-)
>>>
>>>> Who has access to the buildsystem and who has access to the keys for
>>>> signing wrt. CentOS 4.9, 5.6 and 6.0 ?
>>
>> We don't just use one buildsystem ... like I said, it is not just about
>> building.  I don't think I need to discuss our internal infrastructure
>> on an open list either.
>>
>> Jim Perrin and Fabian Arrotin also have access to some infrastructure
>> too.  Tim Verhoeven has some access as well.  Not to the signing keys
>> ... not many people have that, but to be able to build some packages.
>>
>> Akemi Yagi does some packages for us too, notably the CentOS Plus kernel.
>>
>> Not sure where this is going.
> 
> This is going towards more understanding from the community to how CentOS 
> is being built, who is involved and where the problems are situated.
> 
> This information is not available from anywhere else. So only Karanbir, 
> Tru and you have access to the signing keys.
> 
> Jim, Fabian, Tim and Akemi have access to certain buildsystems or 
> infrastructure but have not built any packages for CentOS 4.9, 5.6
> and 6.0 ?
> 
> I guess this also means that just the three of you can produce updates ?
> 
No, it means that only the 3 of us can SIGN updates ... there is a
difference.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110310/0a42ad18/attachment-0007.sig>