2011/3/23 carlopmart <carlopmart at gmail.com>: > On 03/23/2011 11:48 AM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:43:53AM +0100, carlopmart wrote: >>> >>> Both statements says the same with different words ... SL says >>> "compatible" too, like CentOS ... >> >> Honestly... This is a development list. If you need to have the >> concept of binary compatibility explained to you then I fear you >> are in the wrong place. >> >> > > Honestly ... I know the meaning of the concept of "binary compatible". I > don't understand is where you see the difference between CentOS and SL > about this. Where is the difference? carlopmart, please go to the -users list with this, one of the CentOS devs actually posted a relevant example of the SL/CentOS differences earlier today: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2011-March/108389.html Best regards Kenni