[CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgWed May 4 15:52:14 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/04/2011 03:51 PM, David Hollis wrote: > Would httpd-2.2.3-45.el5_6.centos.1 possibly be more appropriate (albeit not really. Look at it from the point of view of what that el5_6 represents upstream. also, Ned if you look back at the history of the RHEL platform you will see that the actual tag isnt used in update comparisons. - KB
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list