[CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgWed May 4 17:06:08 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/04/2011 06:00 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > The issue here is a) it's different from upstream, and b) you're not > being consistent as you rebuild some packages with the el5_6 style dist > tag but not for others. The only place we change that is when its a centos mod package; not otherwise. Changing this policy for CentOS-5 at this stage does not seem like a good idea at all. > httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.3.src.rpm > httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_2.4.src.rpm > > here el5_2.4> el5_1.3 yes, but so was .el5.centos.4 > .el5.centos.3 > Is that intentional on the part of upstream? I doubt we'll ever know the > answer to that. it is by design, it is my understanding that the right-of %{dist} only changes within a single point release cycle. - KB
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list