[CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgThu May 5 10:54:27 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 05/04/2011 06:54 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: > So this would only work if it is guaranteed that: > > - .centos is always added during the entire lifespan yes, and we should be doing this > - the version is not different but only %{dist} changes that is irrelevant. The whole point is that the way packages are released upstream the tag component, while present and relevant, isnt considered in the EVR > prev.relese-EVR - KB
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list