[CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
John R. Dennison
jrd at gerdesas.comThu May 5 11:21:14 UTC 2011
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 01:17:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: (49 lines of noise trimmed out) > I know, the CentOS developers are simply ignoring the relevance of this. > > It seems to be their new credo. So Dag... How's DagOS coming along? John -- Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it. -- Brian W. Kernighan -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110505/76513682/attachment-0002.sig>
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Confusing package versioning
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list