Hi Steve, On 04/30/2011 11:41 PM, Steve Barnes wrote: > - is there a git repository or similar source that contains all of the currently available test scripts? It would be helpful to know that, given my copious spare time, I'm not re-inventing any > wheels or contributing the 57th LAMP install script. Not at the moment, but lets try and get something setup in the next few days. The setup we have at the moment does some of the provisioning, setup and then the tests. We need to isolate the tests from that git repo and setup something new, publicly visible. Should happen real soon. > - relating to package installation test scripts, would there be any appreciable benefit to simply throwing everything + kitchen sink at the wall and see what _doesn't_ stick? (i.e., yum install > every single available package one after the other and record any failures?) This seems like a more...comprehensive method of uncovering package installation issues than me simply picking "my top 10 > favourite/most well known" yum packages. That depends on what you are trying to achieve. Not every packages needs to be installable at the same time as everything else. > - is the scope for test scripts "anything you can think of that performs some kind of configuration change with a measurable return value" - e.g, tests that cover (for example) networking > configuration, partition/filesystem creation, package installation, firewall configuration, user/group account creation/deletion/editing, SSH key generation etc etc etc? sure. Go for it. > - at present, each test script needs to be self-contained. To reduce the amount of code duplication/maintenance is there any intention (or objection) to developing a library of helper functions? there is a common set of lib + functions that can be used to make life easier, we then just need to make sure its well documented and maintained. At the moment they all go into <root dir>/functions/ and are 'sourced' before the tests are copied / moved / run. Which also makes them very bash specific. - KB