Le 05/05/11 13:22, Karanbir Singh a écrit : > On 05/05/2011 12:17 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>> The most important thing is RHEL5_X now sligthly differs with RHEL5_Y, >>> and this may affect compatibility, like with the last mod_nss release. >>> So I have an interest to immediatly visualise that my foo package, >>> modified by CentOS, was rebuilt on el5_X rather than el5_Y. Karanbir, Let's have a little clarification. I wrote the above paragraph and I assume it. Dag wrote the (indigo) sentences below and I got them out of my post because I don't agree. I'm not with or against someone. I just want to discuss on a devel list, not to troll or give any food to some flam war. >> I know, the CentOS developers are simply ignoring the relevance of this. > by assuming that the _x and _y imply that the code is built on, you > already dont know what you are talking about Ok, I assume that say that _x and _y having been built on different instances would have been a more correct assertion, but after saying that, doesn't the difference between these two instances still remains. JML >> It seems to be their new credo. > troll > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110505/f8c0ceb6/attachment-0007.html>