Le 05/05/11 14:02, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit : > Le 05/05/11 13:22, Karanbir Singh a écrit : >> On 05/05/2011 12:17 PM, Dag Wieers wrote: >>>> The most important thing is RHEL5_X now sligthly differs with RHEL5_Y, >>>> and this may affect compatibility, like with the last mod_nss release. >>>> So I have an interest to immediatly visualise that my foo package, >>>> modified by CentOS, was rebuilt on el5_X rather than el5_Y. > > Karanbir, > > Let's have a little clarification. I wrote the above paragraph and I > assume it. Dag wrote the (indigo) sentences below and I got them out > of my post because I don't agree. I'm not with or against someone. I > just want to discuss on a devel list, not to troll or give any food to > some flam war. I just recieve the first post Dag intended for me and the list got aslo got... Sorry, part of my last answer was based on some misunderstood... Please could we now focus on the technical point of vue ? >>> I know, the CentOS developers are simply ignoring the relevance of this. > >> by assuming that the _x and _y imply that the code is built on, you >> already dont know what you are talking about > >>> It seems to be their new credo. >> troll >> >> - KB -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20110505/1d8d78bb/attachment-0007.html>