Hi. I agree. I think there is no added value to this seperate repo. Besides it is stalling new releases coming out sooner. +1 Regards, Marko On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > We are still in the early days of CentOS-6, and perhaps a change in > policy at this time might be acceptable. I'd like to propose moving the > CR repo into the mainline repos. So the change I'm proposing is : > > - to have a /6/ release that is always updated. > > - to have the /6.X/ releases that are contained to within that point release > > what this means is that /6/ will point at the most recent release of > 6.X/ for the os/ & isos/ repo. The other repos would be local to the /6/ > symlink, and will be always updated ( and stay that way ). > > there is going to be quite a lot of implications backend / mirror side > that we will need to work out, but its effort + pain as a one off, for > what can be a major improvement in the user experience. > > thoughts ? > > - KB > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.