It looks like there is need in little clarification / saying it more clear Vreme: 11/01/2011 03:15 PM, Karanbir Singh piše: > hi guys, > > We are still in the early days of CentOS-6, and perhaps a change in > policy at this time might be acceptable. I'd like to propose moving the > CR repo into the mainline repos. So the change I'm proposing is : > > - to have a /6/ release that is always updated. Does this means CR packages would go into updates repo? I use ISO = os repo, + updates repo, for mirroring. > > - to have the /6.X/ releases that are contained to within that point release So in 6.1 would go all CR packages and further updates until 6.2 packages? > > what this means is that /6/ will point at the most recent release of > 6.X/ for the os/& isos/ repo. The other repos would be local to the /6/ > symlink, and will be always updated ( and stay that way ). > > there is going to be quite a lot of implications backend / mirror side > that we will need to work out, but its effort + pain as a one off, for > what can be a major improvement in the user experience. > > thoughts ? > > - KB -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant