On 11/01/2011 10:48 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/01/2011 02:40 PM, Ferry Huberts wrote: >> >> I would welcome this very much, it makes my mirroring setup much easier >> in that I don't have to update it every time a 6.x release comes out >> (since I'm only interested in mirroring the latest release ofcourse) >> > > It is actually going to add a lot of complexity to the mirroring setup. > There will no longer be consistent point release tree's, and the /6/ > target will keep changing, all the time. So you will need to carry on > mirroring the entire centos/6/ tree anyway > > the exact mechanics of how we implement this would still need to be > worked out. > > - KB Personally, I'd prefer to keep CR separate and have the main releases as they've been. The idea behind CentOS is that it is super stable and matches upstream. I worry that merging CR will hurt the stability. I've enabled CR on some test nodes and started seeing issues, minor though they may be. So +1 to keeping the status quo. :) -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "omg my singularity battery is dead again. stupid hawking radiation." - epitron