On 11/01/2011 11:50 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 11/01/2011 03:47 PM, Digimer wrote: >> Personally, I'd prefer to keep CR separate and have the main releases as >> they've been. > > with the point release going into /6.x/ you will have the option to keep > things as they are as well. Would that cover your use case ? it would > allow you to do the point release switch manually, whenever you chose to > do so. So long as I can do a 'yum update' and not get the next y-stream packages until the actual y-stream is released proper, I am happy. In other words, so long as the stability of my nodes is not effected in any way, and compatibility with upstream also remains, I am happy. :) >> The idea behind CentOS is that it is super stable and matches upstream. >> I worry that merging CR will hurt the stability. I've enabled CR on some >> test nodes and started seeing issues, minor though they may be. > > I hope you are opening bug reports for these issues! I'm ashamed to say that I neglected to do so. I saw kernel oopses while working on other things and didn't get back to them... I'll be sure to file a bug next I see it. -- Digimer E-Mail: digimer at alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org "omg my singularity battery is dead again. stupid hawking radiation." - epitron