On 11/29/2011 06:24 AM, Peter Meier wrote: >> Sometime ago I also tried to write a scrapper script in python to get >> all the erratas. My major crib that time was: >> 1. No fixed format of the subject line which made it difficult to >> scrap the package name > > I think this is something that CentOS could improve in general about > how their Erratas are available. Karanbir Singh recently mentioned on > #pulp, that if there is something that could be done to help to > integrate CentOS better into pulp, this should be brought up to the > CentOS developers. (If I understood his comment correctly....) > > So this is imho something that could be brought up on the centos-devel > list, or on the more appropriate one, if that doesn't fit there. > > Hence, I CC this to the centos-devel list. I hope this is fine for everybody. > We can not "copy" what they have, this would be a term of service breach of their "Errata Portal" We can point to things, we can't copy them ... hence the links and the announce list. > @centos-devel: Thread: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/2011-November/msg00110.html > >> 2. Red Hat would announce the errata and only after a few days centos >> errata will come out. The time gap in the two made the server >> vulnerable. > > This is the price you pay for CentOS. If you don't like that, you > should buy RedHat. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 262 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20111129/f21764dc/attachment-0007.sig>