On 09/14/2011 07:09 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > Is this intentional or something missed? Kind proves an earlier point I made that a single swap of symlink from > intentional at this point. You will see the /6/cr/ as soon as there are rpms publicly visible and consumable in there. I would love to hear your comments on my post w.r.t the symlink issue on the centos list. - KB