On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 5:08 AM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: >>> That's probably what 90% of people will be happy with. > > interesting. are you saying that most people are not interested in > tracking specific CVE's etc ? I think I missed the basic premise here. The specifics only matter when you don't have a known fix installed. Separating things isn't the point so much as just getting them in the update stream so normal updates install them. Is this for the special case where normal updates are backed up from build issues at a point/version release - or to help where people don't want updates to fix bugs unless they are security-related? -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com