On 08/08/2012 09:10 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> yes, and working on facts that are upto 4 years out of date is'nt ideal >> either. Its quite possible that software out there has evolved in the >> mean time. > > That is what I'm afraid to hear. It means the time and effort spent > back then has gone to the waste land unless there is anything you can > salvage (not savage). thats quite a strange comment - are you saying that we should only consider software as it was back in 2008 and ignore the fact that it might have moved on since then ? > Just hope the current thread does not follow all the past examples and > die down... depends a lot on intention and the desire to fix something. If we make the effort and go through with it - I am sure it will happen. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc