[CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
Greg Bailey
gbailey at lxpro.comTue Feb 28 13:44:40 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
It's a minor issue, but I opened http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4951 some time ago against CentOS 6, because I noticed that most of the files on the DVD image(s) are owned by UID=500, and it's inconsistent with upstream. I just checked my CentOS 5.7 iso, and it's in the same situation; with 5.8 being worked, does it make sense to consider this bug entry for 5.8 ISO creation? Or does a new bug need to be filed? thanks, Greg
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] CentOS plus kernel-devel x86_64 with incomplete Module.symvers?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list