[CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
Karanbir Singh
mail-lists at karan.orgTue Feb 28 14:10:22 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 02/28/2012 01:44 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: > I just checked my CentOS 5.7 iso, and it's in the same situation; with > 5.8 being worked, does it make sense to consider this bug entry for 5.8 > ISO creation? Or does a new bug need to be filed? yes, pleas file a bugreport. We're building the 5.8 isos now ( well, we already did ) but I'm happy to redo the mkiso's to fix this ownership issue. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219 | Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Should bugs.centos.org entries be duped for CentOS 5 and CentOS 6?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list