On 02/27/2012 12:08 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > On 02/26/2012 07:58 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob at internet24.de> >> wrote: >>> On Feb 26, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Thomas Jacob<jacob at internet24.de> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> However this is not a centosplus kernel. It should say: >>>> >>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers >>>> >>>> And I see: >>>> >>>> $ awk '{print $4;}' >>>> /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.centos.plus.x86_64/Module.symvers >>>> | sort | uniq -c >>>> 6193 EXPORT_SYMBOL >>>> 3897 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL >>> >>> Oh yes, sorry about that, I seem to have mixed this up with >>> the "updates" packages of CentOS proper. >>> >>> So is this an RHEL upstream problem then? Sorry I am rather >>> new to the CentOS package building intrinsics .... >> I don't think this problem exists in the RHEL kernel. Could someone >> check the distro CentOS 2.6.32-220.4.2.el6 kernel? > [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.2.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | > uniq -c > 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL > 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL > [wolfy at wolfy2 V101]$ awk '{print $4;}' > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64/Module.symvers | sort | > uniq -c > 6094 EXPORT_SYMBOL > 3888 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL > [root at DB ~]# awk '{print $4;}' > /usr/src/kernels/2.6.32-220.4.2.el6.i686/Module.symvers | sort | uniq -c > 6124 EXPORT_SYMBOL > 3706 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL > Sorry for not mentioning: all 3 above are pure centos kernels. And the number of symbols does not coincide with the ones from the original post...