[CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
office at plnet.rsMon Jan 23 14:36:09 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/23/2012 12:02 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > anyway - i like the core idea of a desktop version but what distinguish that one from > the upstream client / workstation version (beside any 3rd party software repository). All 3rd party repos have their own pace. RepoForge for instance does not care what happens in EPEL. I see a need for possible "override of certain packages in "master" repository for the "desktop distro" so upgrade and install paths are stable. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list