[CentOS-devel] What name would be acceptable for Desktop version of CentOS?

Fri Jan 20 19:03:19 UTC 2012
Ljubomir Ljubojevic <office at plnet.rs>

On 01/20/2012 07:56 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> I would like to stay as close as possible to CentOS name,
>> because it practically is CentOS, with third-party
>> repositories enabled
> You know, the CentOS project takes much care to avoid coming
> 'too close' to the trade marks of others ... It is just
> unfriendly not to respect that effort and history, and to
> consciously try to be 'as close as possible' to the mark of
> another
> the proposed name form will cause brand confusion in the mind
> of un-careful readers who do not follow 'inside baseball'
> branding issues.  It will result in 'load' coming to the
> CentOS support venues, rather than the place that shipped
> non-CentOS code.  When the such confused souls do show up
> anyway in CentOS support venue, the load will fall on people
> other than your sub-project, Ljubomir.  Is this just?
> Please choose something else

Once again, THAT IS why I am asking here before I make any decision. My 
first impulse was CentDOS, but I chose to suppress it and come here and 
ask for projects opinion what is and what is not acceptable, and choose 
from acceptable ones.


Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
trusty Spiderman...
StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant