On 01/20/2012 06:53 PM, Matt Rose wrote: > You could also be a little adventurous and call it something entirely > different, like Chocolate. (though that probably popped into my head > because of Linux Mint). I would like to stay as close as possible to CentOS name, because it practically is CentOS, with third-party repositories enabled. Intention is to provide easily installable packages from various repositories, but I have no desire to make it into developing distro, just a bunch of carefully chosen and above all as stable as possible packages sitting on top of the CentOS (with as little as possible replaced packages) that will attract Desktop users wanting stability above all, but not knowledgeable enough to decide what package from what repository they are to chose. I have not made any decision yet about a name, and I am very well aware of negative implications some proposed names have, that is precisely why I asked for a fresh perspective and additional input. I did not want to put any ideas into your heads, but I have chosen instead to hear your original sentiment. Problem with CentOS-DE I see is that it consists of two words when you say it, it would be better that it is one fluid word that clearly defines it in conversation. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant