On 01/20/2012 07:56 PM, R P Herrold wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> I would like to stay as close as possible to CentOS name, >> because it practically is CentOS, with third-party >> repositories enabled > > You know, the CentOS project takes much care to avoid coming > 'too close' to the trade marks of others ... It is just > unfriendly not to respect that effort and history, and to > consciously try to be 'as close as possible' to the mark of > another > > the proposed name form will cause brand confusion in the mind > of un-careful readers who do not follow 'inside baseball' > branding issues. It will result in 'load' coming to the > CentOS support venues, rather than the place that shipped > non-CentOS code. When the such confused souls do show up > anyway in CentOS support venue, the load will fall on people > other than your sub-project, Ljubomir. Is this just? > > Please choose something else > Once again, THAT IS why I am asking here before I make any decision. My first impulse was CentDOS, but I chose to suppress it and come here and ask for projects opinion what is and what is not acceptable, and choose from acceptable ones. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant