On 01/23/2012 05:28 PM, David Hrbáč wrote: > Dne 23.1.2012 15:36, Ljubomir Ljubojevic napsal(a): >> All 3rd party repos have their own pace. RepoForge for instance does >> not care what happens in EPEL. I see a need for possible "override of >> certain packages in "master" repository for the "desktop distro" so >> upgrade and install paths are stable. > > So, Epel does so? > DH Yury and David, forgive me for not being thorough in my statement. I do not accuse RepoForge of anything, all of you guys there do your best and I appreciate it. Bad choice of words. And I especially should have limited this statement to audio/video codec subsistem (gstreamer particularly). My sincere apologies. But you have to concede that consequence for noob user is the same regardless of the cause. I wanted to explain that with conflicts between aTrpms, RepoForge and EPEL (and others) regular user must have larger knowledge how to resolve those conflicts via yum commands. I regard EPEL as second level repository (base/updates/centosplus/extras and ElRepo are first), RepoForge third level repository and aTrpms forth level repository (compiling/rebuilding environment issues and other stuff). That is why I singled out RepoForge and not some other repository. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant