[CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
Alessandro Ren
alessandro.ren at opservices.com.brThu Sep 13 16:52:10 UTC 2012
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 9/13/2012 1:48 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > One bit of feedback at LinuxCon this year from people was that we should > ship epel with a lower barrier to entry. And I have mixed feelings about > that. But I wanted to know what everyone else thinks about : > > > yum repositories > Summary : Various Yum Repositories > These are not supported by Scientific Linux but are here for your > convenience. > > This is not installed by default. > -- adobe-release > -- atrpms-repo > -- elrepo-release > -- epel-release > -- rpmforge-release I wound´t mind it this repos came installed but disabled buy default, I dont know, but it seems that everybody ends up installing some of them anyway. But, if they came disabled, the vanilla CentOS environment would not be affected without user intervention. CentOS would remain CentOS the same it is today. []s.
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Shipping an EPEL release
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list