My vote is for 1 , maybe even 2 :) It is truly usable and it is the first thing on new installs ;) Regards, Marko On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Karanbir Singh wrote: > hi guys, > > One bit of feedback at LinuxCon this year from people was that we should > ship epel with a lower barrier to entry. And I have mixed feelings about > that. But I wanted to know what everyone else thinks about : > > 1) Shipping epel-release in CentOS-Extras, so its installable, usable > out of the box. > > 2) Shipping epel-release in the distro itself, with the epel repos's > enabled=false. This is the option that most people seem to want, but I > am least keen on. > > 3) do nothing, leave things as they are. > > Ofcourse, if we do either (1) or (2) we would need to set some sort of a > baseline standard that allows other repo's to be included as well ( as + > if they meet the baseline standard ) > > regards, > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.