On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Tru Huynh <tru at centos.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 09:26:04PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > > > > I'm writing up a spec file that depends on devtoolset and then sets > > CXX to /opt/centos/devtoolset-1.1/root/usr/bin/g++ so that it can use > > the compiler installed by that package. I was just wonder a few > > things: > > 1) Is that the "final" path? Or will it change to match the path in > > RHEL once this development build of it moves to a permanent location? > > /opt/rh is currently a link to /opt/centos > SL is using /opt/rh OK, cool. I didn't know about the /opt/rh link, so I'll use that. > > 2) If the answer to #1 is yes, is there a way to distinguish between > > RHEL and CentOS in the spec file so it can use the appropriate path > > for each of them? > don't bother :) > > /opt/rh should work all the time. > > BTW, devtools-2 beta has been released but only to Red Hat customers, > not yet in the public area. Ya, I saw news about that a little bit ago. It's definitely cool that they're making new tools available like that, but in the spec file, is there a way to specify just to use the newer gcc from devtoolset other than just doing CXX=<full path>? Because when the full path has to be specified, then I have to hard code it to a specific version of the devtoolset when in reality I would be fine with using the gcc from devtoolset 1.0, 1.1 or 2.0. Any ideas/suggestions? Thanks, Dave