On 04/26/2014 03:54 PM, Ned Slider wrote: > So yes, by all means ship repo release packages in extras, but ship them > 'as is', bugs and all from the upstream repo. Personally, I'd much > prefer you didn't even rebuild them - I'd rather see CentOS just > redistribute the upstream built and signed binary packages via the > extras repository. They at least need to be re-signed. Yum is going to be unhappy about installing packages with unknown signatures from CentOS Extras. -- Kevin Stange Chief Technology Officer Steadfast | http://steadfast.net Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 246 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140426/ee3c7d80/attachment-0005.sig>