[CentOS-devel] Request for epel-release package in CentOS repo

Sat Apr 26 21:59:01 UTC 2014
Kevin Stange <kevin at steadfast.net>

On 04/26/2014 03:54 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> So yes, by all means ship repo release packages in extras, but ship them 
> 'as is', bugs and all from the upstream repo. Personally, I'd much 
> prefer you didn't even rebuild them - I'd rather see CentOS just 
> redistribute the upstream built and signed binary packages via the 
> extras repository.

They at least need to be re-signed.  Yum is going to be unhappy about
installing packages with unknown signatures from CentOS Extras.

Kevin Stange
Chief Technology Officer
Steadfast | http://steadfast.net
Phone: 312-602-2689 ext. 203 | Fax: 312-602-2688

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/attachments/20140426/ee3c7d80/attachment-0005.sig>