Yes, I think we'll definitely look into having a periodic IRC meeting as things gain momentum so that we can include a wider swath of the population. For the first couple I wanted the conversation to flow quickly so we could just hash things out and get the basic stuff in place. For those who still would like to follow along at home I tried to keep a napkin sketch of what was discussed and have it posted on the CentOS wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Storage/Minutes If others are interested in becoming more actively involved in the Storage SIG please let me know and I can find the best fit (there is plenty to do!). Mostly I'd love to have experienced package maintainers who would either help newbie RPM builders (like me) get up to speed, or just help establish a procedure that can be largely automated. We're shooting for a solid CentOS build and installable storage packaging to be established and usable by the end of April. Anyone who wants to help us get there, drop me a line! Thanks. Best Regards, Patrick McGarry Director, Community || Inktank http://ceph.com || http://inktank.com @scuttlemonkey || @ceph || @inktank On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Karanbir Singh <mail-lists at karan.org> wrote: > On 04/04/2014 08:20 PM, Nux! wrote: >> On 20.03.2014 18:27, Karsten Wade wrote: >>> >>> Similar to the idea of keeping discussions on centos-devel for now, >>> having meetings on a low-barrier medium such as IRC has many benefits >>> that continue to outweigh the downsides.[0] >> >> Sorry for extending the offtopic, but +1000 (cum laude!) for the IRC >> proposal. > > IRC is right for many reasons, but lets keep in mind that irc has very > low velocity. > > > -- > Karanbir Singh > +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh > GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel