On 10/04/2014 17:07, George Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:45 PM, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth at xen.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> just a quick note that I found the CentOS board meeting minutes which >> state that the Virt SIG is moving forward. Consequently I updated >> * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization >> * http://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Virtualization/Proposal (& >> http://www.centos.org/minutes/2014/march/centos-devel.2014-03-05-21.04.html) >> >> Apologies for the short notice. We are going to have a first quick >> meeting on Friday the 11th, 11:00AM BST (London time) because many of us >> will be on the road the following weeks and we didn't want to stall >> progress. Please drop me a line if you want to participate on lars dot >> kurth at xenproject dot org. If you cannot make it, don't worry: we will >> set up a proper regular meeting once everyone is back from their travels >> and revisit agenda items as needed. It probably wont be very popular, >> but I'd propose a hangout or teleconf and will write up minutes. >> >> I expect that we will cover >> * Meeting time & cadence >> * Form & Function (confirm who does what based on the current list of >> members) >> * Infrastructure loose ends (repositories, lists, access, etc - enough >> pointers to get started) >> * Establish a draft TODO list >> * Identify potential additions to SIG (KVM, OpenVZ, etc. and whether >> there are any individuals to proactively reach out to) > We might want to discuss relationships to other SIGs -- it's not yet > quite clear to me the boundary between "Virt SIG" and "Cloud SIG", > particularly relating to being a cloud compute node. (see the > question re opencloudnode, for instance). Agreed Lars