-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/25/2014 02:58 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 04/25/2014 03:14 AM, Karsten Wade wrote: >> In that scenario, we accept the huge listing at github.com/centos >> and point people at the organized centos.github.com page >> instead. > > would'nt git.centos.org meet this requirement ? it can group by > teams, by subdir or by tags for individual repos ( allowing users > to setup their own 'views' as it were ). > > Also, a static pageset will need some level of automation to keep > it in sync with the repo states, the git.c.o interface works on the > git repos themselves, so as long as its got the github url as an > alternate source, it should remain in sync ( but obviously, cant > pupp metadata from github, so stuff like pending merge-requests etc > will still be only on github ) OK, then it sounds like going with separate organizations for each SIG e.g. CentOS-Virt-SIG, CentOS-Storage-SIG, etc.? That lets the SIGs run their own group independently, raising people to full contributor status through usual merit channels, and keeps things channelized nicely. - - Karsten - -- Karsten 'quaid' Wade .^\ CentOS Doer of Stuff http://TheOpenSourceWay.org \ http://community.redhat.com @quaid (identi.ca/twitter/IRC) \v' gpg: AD0E0C41 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNa0mwACgkQ2ZIOBq0ODEHNMACeM2pS7eCNaYfMjERhrk06buwe GWgAoKR0z+zPSwHSSPDA+JPCQMy8xA3k =BlZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----