Short wrap-up:
* scl packages get build as scratch build already
* but there is a problem in centpkg and centos koji with fedora-like
layout and these tools only support centos layout (spec files in SPECS,
sources in SOURCES dir)
* hhorak will see how big problem this is regarding the cherry-picking
and merging, since it is an important requirement for rhscl maintainers
to user centos as upstream
* it is not problem to keep any structure in upstream repos, but how
to build such packages is not very clear
* prefixes conversation -- very long one
* using rh- prefix should solve:
1) separate rh driven/shipped scls from other communities
2) not cause huge pain on people writing dependent collections
3) not stomping on existing (non-scl) package names
* then there was a long discussion about where the prefix should be
used -- whether in the name of the collection or in the dist tag
... many thought given, but no consensus reached so far, so the
conversation will continue somehow, somewhere
Honza
On 12/16/2014 07:18 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston,
> 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode.
>
> = Topics =
> * current status
> * prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs
>
> _______________________________________________
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg