Hi Honza, Just wanted to apologise for missing this today, had to attend irl meetings at work. I do intend to come along in future. Thanks! Jon Sent from my iPad > On 17 Dec 2014, at 18:49, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com> wrote: > > Short wrap-up: > * scl packages get build as scratch build already > * but there is a problem in centpkg and centos koji with fedora-like layout and these tools only support centos layout (spec files in SPECS, sources in SOURCES dir) > * hhorak will see how big problem this is regarding the cherry-picking and merging, since it is an important requirement for rhscl maintainers to user centos as upstream > * it is not problem to keep any structure in upstream repos, but how to build such packages is not very clear > > * prefixes conversation -- very long one > * using rh- prefix should solve: > 1) separate rh driven/shipped scls from other communities > 2) not cause huge pain on people writing dependent collections > 3) not stomping on existing (non-scl) package names > * then there was a long discussion about where the prefix should be used -- whether in the name of the collection or in the dist tag > ... many thought given, but no consensus reached so far, so the conversation will continue somehow, somewhere > > Honza > >> On 12/16/2014 07:18 PM, Honza Horak wrote: >> WG meeting will be at 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 Brno, 11:00 Boston, >> 1:00+1d Tokyo, 2:00+1d Brisbane) in #centos-devel on Freenode. >> >> = Topics = >> * current status >> * prefix for packages in upstream and downstream SCLs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SCLorg mailing list >> SCLorg at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS-devel mailing list > CentOS-devel at centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-devel