On 02/26/2014 08:15 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 05:53:43AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> Both EPEL and ELRepo have said they do not want to be a CentOS SIG and >> want to be "independent". We have offered and they have refused .. Okay > > Can you point me to this discussion? I didn't see anything at all on the > EPEL devel mailing list, but maybe I missed it. > > I don't think that EPEL wants to move out of Fedora (there are a lot of > advantages to sharing dist-git and koji, at least), but I at least would be > interested in seeing more collaboration where it makes sense. I don't know > if a SIG is exactly the right framework for that, but it's possible that it > is. > > In any case, to my knowledge, this is simply a conversation that hasn't > happened yet. > > in the coming days/weeks it gets easier to have that conversation as we get repo policies and actually work through content. What we might need to do is establish a baseline that everyone can look at and given the amount of traction EPEL has, see how and what we need to do in order to align things up. but yea, a conversation that really needs to take place at some point in the future. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc