Hi Patrick, On 02/03/2014 02:31 PM, Patrick McGarry wrote: > Just wanted to check on this and see if anyone had thoughts on the > formation of a storage SIG? I'm also usually idling on freenode (and > in #centos) as 'scuttlemonkey' if someone would like to discuss this > further. Thanks. What we need to do is get the proposal stuff done, in front of the board for the approval and then start working to import content. I know that ceph easily seperates the cluster end from the client side, it might then be easier to consider one part of the equation before the other ? At fosdem, I did manange to have a series of conversations with people around the idea of shared code across SIG's ( the sort of thing we might need to look into for the qemu config changes needed to make ceph work in the client side ), and its going to be a harder problem to solve. How are you placed to consider the storage and client sides of ceph as independant components ? Finally, I presume you are stepping up to the Storage SIG representative :) - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc