[CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future

Ljubomir Ljubojevic centos at plnet.rs
Thu Jan 16 15:43:51 UTC 2014


On 01/16/2014 02:31 PM, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-01-16 at 06:45 -0600, Jim Perrin wrote:
>>
>> We cannot dictate what 3rd parties do, and we'll very likely have to
>> go through a period of proving to them that becoming a SIG and/or
>> working together is a good idea. There's quite a bit of tension about
>> this from many past experiences.
>
> Working together is a *great* idea, but specifically in the context of
> third-party repositories, I'd personally see it more as a manpower issue
> (and mostly on their/our side).
>
> Regarding the past tensions, I'm really hopeful that in view of the
> recent exciting news, the most prominent sources thereof will become
> something of the past.
>

Yury, you speak as a maintainer still involved with RepoForge/RPMForge, 
right?

-- 
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe

StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant



More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list