[CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.comMon Jan 13 19:18:39 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org> wrote: > > The way I envision this working is as follows: > > - Tier 1 repositories: Adds packages only. These repos may not update > or replace anything in the core distribution. (Example: EPEL) What about the scenario where you want packages from more than one tier 1 repo? Will there be some coordination to at least try to avoid conflicts across them or document the workarounds if they happen? It will probably be common to require EPEL in addition to at least one other tier 1 (unless there is a horrible amount of duplication) - so what will prevent the addition of packages into EPEL that conflict with other tier 1's even if they start out without conflicts? -- Les Mikesell
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list