[CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
Trevor Hemsley
trevor.hemsley at ntlworld.comFri Jan 17 12:27:31 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 17/01/14 12:19, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 01/15/2014 07:24 PM, Trevor Hemsley wrote: > >> One other thing to think about in advance perhaps: what happens when one >> of the packages involved in a SIG variant gets picked up by RHEL and >> becomes Tech Preview or Supported in the distro? Does that SIG repo go >> from tier 1 to tier 2 in the timespan it takes to read the RH Release >> Notes? :-) > > This is a decent point to think about. Do you have any suggestions or > recommendations about this? Is there anyone from EPEL listening here? I think they've already discussed this sort of thing to death in the last few years so we could probably learn from them. How do they handle this sort of thing? If we don't have anyone from EPEL around... why not? T
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list