[CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future

On 01/17/2014 07:08 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:

> make it 5 or 10, please. one might want to supersede base packages with 
> ones from private/local repos. hplip for instance was such a candidate 
> for a long time, my printers were not supported by the stock version of 
> hplip from EL5 and I had to compile a newer one from fedora. and at the 
> time I was not yet relying on include/excludepkgs
>


This touches exactly on the point for why I don't want to include
priorities by default. To make it useful for repos that provide newer
software than what exists in base/updates (php, httpd, libvirt,
whatever), you're automatically working against priorities. It doesn't
matter if it's for a local repository or for a SIG.


-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77