[CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
Jim Perrin
jperrin at centos.orgFri Jan 17 13:35:29 UTC 2014
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/17/2014 07:08 AM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > make it 5 or 10, please. one might want to supersede base packages with > ones from private/local repos. hplip for instance was such a candidate > for a long time, my printers were not supported by the stock version of > hplip from EL5 and I had to compile a newer one from fedora. and at the > time I was not yet relying on include/excludepkgs > This touches exactly on the point for why I don't want to include priorities by default. To make it useful for repos that provide newer software than what exists in base/updates (php, httpd, libvirt, whatever), you're automatically working against priorities. It doesn't matter if it's for a local repository or for a SIG. -- Jim Perrin The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
- Previous message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Next message: [CentOS-devel] Repository structures for SIG and variants in the future
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CentOS-devel mailing list